|
History of the US Nationals
From the Jan Feb 1982 Water Skier
..... Read more about
the 1st 2nd and 3rd
US Nationals
Evolution of the Nationals
Dan Hains could hardly forsee the 42 years of achievement that have shaped the character of AWSA, by Duke Cullimore
What is the National Water Ski Championships?
There is no pat answer to that question because the replies you get will vary
greatly depending upon whom you ask. To some, the Nationals represents a
family vacation with skiing and social opportunities. To others, this once-yearly
tournament is a challenge involving hard work and long hours to make the
event happen. Still others, certainly in the majority, see the Nationals
as the ultimate opportunity to test their skills against rivals to determine
who are the best water skiers in the nation. And there are some who look
upon the Nationals as a commercial venture, a showcase for skis, boats and
other equipment, with the prize being an opportunity to beat the drums of
self promotion.
If you study the history of the Nationals, It's obvious that
you're dealing with a complex matter. Woven into the rich fabric of personalities,
places
and events are wandering threads of success and failure that emerge in an overall
pattern which exemplifies the character of the American Water Ski Association.
In the final analysis, the National tournament is a mirror of AWSA, reflecting
it accomplishments over the past 42 years as the association has endeavored
to meet the challenges of its charter.
After the incorporation of AWSA as a non-profit organization
in early 1939, it didn't take long for founder Dan Hains to decide that what
the fledgling
association needed was some sort of attention-getting event to focus interest
on the group and the sport. That summer, he and a few other area skiers decided
to promote the first national tournament. They chose a site at Jones Beach
State Park on Long Island.
Not much is known about that tournament because records of it
were destroyed in a fire some years later. And, as Hains later said, deciding
to call the
event a "national" tournament was somewhat presumptuous since almost
all of the competitors were local skiers.
In spite of being "national" in name only, this
first championship meet did produce some cornerstones that helped to form
the foundation of tournament
water skiing as we know it today. Perhaps the most important of these was the
establishment at the very beginning of the threeevent tournament - slalom,
jumping and tricks - which remains the basis for competition today.
Tournament skiing wasn't the same then as we know it now. For one thing, the
slalom course was run in a straight line, the contestants weaving through a
series of eight buoys. Jumping was really a challenge. The ramp was 24 feet
long with the high end five feet above the water, both measurements not too
far from those used today. But there the resemblance ceased. The surface of
the ramp was composed of small wooden rollers with about six inches of space
between each row. It's probably just as well that the boat they had for pulling
skiers in that first Nationals was powered by a 33-horsepower outboard engine.
Anything faster and there would have been more injuries than the one broken
arm reported. The contest seemed to revolve around who could get over the ramp
without crashing. And since judging was done on form only, distance not counting,
selecting the winner was easy. The first National title went to Jack Schiess,
the only man who didn't fall on three jumps.
Trick skiing was in its infancy then. Bruce Parker, who was to become world-renowned
for his water skiing performances, won tricks by taking one ski off, hooking
the tow handle over the instep of his free foot, and holding the off ski over
his head. His second trick consisted of putting the ski back on and staying
up. While they
were considered daring at the time, neither trick would count Jor points in
one of today's highscoring runs. Parker also won the slalom event that day
and subsequently captured the men's overall title. There were only two divisions
of skiers: men and women. Esther Yates won women's slalom and women's overall
title.
Two more National Championships were held, in 1940 and '41,
before restrictions imposed by the Second World War curtailed such activities.
It's notable that
two of the country's foremost skiers of the time, Chuck Sligh and Jack Andresen,
participated in the 1940 meet. Both became important figures in the later
development, of AWSA. Andresen was from New York State and would have had little
problem
being aware of the newly formed association and the Nationals tournament.
But Sligh was a midwesterner, from Holland, Mich., a fact that led to the geographic
expansion of the Nationals in 1941 when he moved the tournament to his home
town.
It didn't take long after the end of the war for interest in
the Nationals to be revived. Sligh promoted two more tournaments in Michigan
in '46 and
& '47. The latter proved to be somewhat of a milestone for competitive
skiing: It was there that the present staggered six-buoy course was first employed.
At the 1947 tourney, the geographic scope of the Nationals expanded with
the
appearance of skiers from such distant states as California and Florida.
The National tournament continued to hop over
the map in the post-war period. In the decade of the '50's, nine different
sites were chosen for the annual contest. The trend continued into the
'60's with all but two of the 10 sites being locations which had never
seen a National
tournament. In the '70's, seven of the 10 Nationals sites had never hosted
the event before. All told, in the past 31 years only eight sites have
hosted the Nationals more than one time, and only one - Callaway Gardens
- has been
the site three times.
This geographical exposure undoubtedly has been beneficial to AWSA. Publicity
surrounding the event, spectators who came out to see some action, and
media coverage have all contributed to introducing water skiing and AWSA
to thousands
of people who might never have become involved. Equally as important
to members have been the many opportunities to participate in tournaments
because at
some time or another one was held near enough to their homes to allow
them to attend.
Down through the years the National tournament has played an
important role in the development of criteria for facilities and equipment
at tournament sites.
Although such things as prevailing winds, water conditions, other boat traffic
and shore facilities were certainly in the minds of early .sponsors, lack of
experience and the scarcity of good sites sometimes resulted in the selection
of less desirable places to hold the championships.
Local ski clubs have always been involved in National tournaments;
however AWSA could offer only limited assistance until 1955 when fulltime leadership
was provided by the Outboard Boating Club of America in Chicago. There had
been a tournament site selection committee, but it operated mostly on the
basis
of personal knowledge of a site and had few - if any - established criteria.
All a local ski club needed in order to sponsor the Nationals was a site
with water on it, enough willing hands to do the work, and some money.
An indication of the problems encountered is gleaned from
the July, 1956 issue of The Water Skier. Stone Lake at LaPorte, Ind., was
that year's Nationals
site, and in reporting on it prior to the tournament, the magazine promised
exclusive use of the lake. "Surrounded by hills. . . the lake can only
be approached by visitors and skiers. This precludes strangers in canoes paddling
through the slalom course or wandering fishermen casting for bass in the shade
of the jump ramp." Such reassurances indicate some of the problems they
were having with sites in those days.
The
first reference in The Water Skier to the responsibilities incurred by a National
tournament sponsor was published in May, 1957, a brief passage
stating that a $10,000 performance
bond was required. In the June, 1960 issue of the magazine is the first
indication of bid specifications which must be submitted by a prospective
sponsor.
Required were a map of the site and facilities, plus information about
financial backing,
experience of the local group, weather, spectator facilities, publicity,
cooperation of civic groups, and housing and food accommodations.
From then on, with the hiring of a full-time executive director
and staff in 1958, continuous development in site standards and performance
requirements
has led to increasing consistency in the staging of a National tournament.
Of equal importance, these criteria have trickled down over the years to Regionals
and other sanctioned tournaments, a process which has established a tradition
of quality and safety in water ski competition. Along with the development
of National tournament site criteria, a simultaneous evolution
was underway in competitive skiing methods and equipment. Jumping offers perhaps
the most dramatic example of this.
Until the advent of the double-cut approach to the jump
in the mid-'50's, a skier attacked the ramp in a straight line and went up
and over. In doing
so he traveled faster than his towboat and as a: result accumulated a lot
of slack line which had the nasty habit of winding itself around an arm or
leg,
and in at least one instance in a tournament, around the neck of a competitor.
Some jumpers used the slack to their advantage by "walking the line." In
effect, they would pull themselves along the line while in the air, a maneuver
that added to the distance of their jump (some skilled skiers could "walk" eight
or ten feet), and to the amount of loose line flying around the skier. Because
of the obvious safety hazard, line walking was eventually ruled out of sanctioned
competition.
The first time the double-wake cut approach to the jump
ramp appeared in the Nationals was in 1954 at Laconia, N.H. Warren Witherell
did it. Recalling the
event he recently said. "I never practiced it before the meet. It was
a desperation effort to make up for the handicap of skiing on borrowed skis.
My custom jumpers were stolen the night before the competition."
His leap measured 100 feet, one foot better than the existing world record.
Unfortunately, it was a foot shy of the two-foot margin required at the time
for a new world mark. It wouldn't have lasted long anyway; the next two jumpers
went 102 and 103 feet, respectively. Witherell finally managed to pin down
the record the following weekend at the New England Open where he cut across
both wakes to soar to 106 feet, still on borrowed skis.
Double-cut jumping really got a kick in the seat at the
1955 Nationals, held at Lakeland, Fla. Swinging wide to the right behind
his towboat, in what
was obviously an unprecedented approach, Alvin "Butch" Rosenberg
suddenly cut back across the wakes, slammed up the ramp and soared 125 feet,
breaking
the old jump record by nine feet.
The crowd on the shore went wild. Never had they seen anything like it. Spectators
in street clothing became so excited that they jumped into the water in
an effort to reach Rosenberg as he skied back to the stands. Although the straight
approach to the ramp continued to be used, along with a modified one-wake
cut, the double-cut had made its mark at the '55 Nationals, and despite
some
objections
to it as being too dangerous, it was gradually adopted by all the better
jumpers.
In at least one respect the National tournament has posed a dilemma for AWSA.
All serious competitors view an opportunity to ski in the Nationals as a dream
come true. It is the summit of their skiing careers, the ultimate reward for
hard work and the skill it produces. Yet there is a clear need to restrict
the number of entrants in the tournament so that it truly is a championship
event produced within a reasonable time frame without placing unreasonable
demands upon sponsors, judges, scorers, boat drivers and all others who work
to make the tournament a success.
Bruce Parker recently recalled that at the first Nationals,
at Jones Beach, there were only 27 skiers; five women and 22 men. During the
'40's and '50's,
the number of competitors gradually increased and in 1954, at Laconia, N.H.,
there were 97 entrants. The following year, at Lakeland, Fla., 161 skiers
entered. Over the next 14 years, the number of entries see-sawed but never
topped 200.
In 1970 there were 212 entrants, and only three years later the figure was
up to 333! Not only had the number of Nationals skiers increased dramatically,
but the rate at which they were increasing had set a fast pace, too.
Thus, the need arose to restrict the number of competitors yet keep the tournament
as open as possible so that it remained a worthy and attainable goal for
AWSA members. Out of this dilemma came the gradual development of the AWSA's
rating
and classification system, a direct benefit of which has been the continual
upgrading of skills among both competitive and recreational skiers.
Classes of competition came about early as a natural result of the need
to group skiers by reason of age as well as sex. In '39, '40 and '41
there were
only two divisions: Men and Women. Then after the war came Jr. Boys,
Jr. Girls and Mixed Doubles. The next divisions to be added were Veterans,
Girls and
Boys. For a few years Jr. Boys and Jr. Girls were dropped, but they were
revived in 1960. At the 1960 Nationals, held in Minneapolis, there were
eight divisions,
in 1973 eleven, and today thirteen.
The need for some sort of qualification system was recognized
as early as 1952, even at a time when there were fewer than 100 skiers showing
up for the
event. At the annual meeting of the Board of Directors, it was noted that the
Classification Committee should be enlarged and the regulations restudied. "More
emphasis on Classification might do much to stimulate improvement in skiing," reported
The Water Skier.
Again, at the annual membership meeting in Long Beach, Calif.,
held in conjunction with the 1953 National tournament, the matter of classification
for competitive
skiers was voiced and the board was instructed to appoint a committee to
make recommendations.
During these years, there were ratings for skiers ranging from Novice to
Expert, but no particular rating or other demonstration of achievement was
required
to compete in the Nationals. Finally, in a rule change published in January,
1955 came the first indication that ratings would begin to figure into eligibility
for Nationals competition. The new rule said, "The tournament committee
of a U.S. National Tournament may, at its own discretion, require that entrants
in any event of any class have passed the Expert rating requirement pertaining
to that event. . ."
It's not likely that the Expert rating option was used
at the 1955 tournament when 161 skiers showed up at Lakeland, the largest
number ever to ski in
a Nationals. Reporting on the meet, the September, 1955 issue of The Water
Skier
offered its opinion that "The 1955 Nationals marked the end of an
era. The entry list in the tournament swelled to a point where skiers were
working
from dawn to dusk. . . water skiing has come of age."
The matter of qualifying National tournament competitors,
simmering on the back burner for so many years, now began to boil over. Among
the
duties handed
to the 1955-56 Tournament Committee, headed by veteran skier Warren Witherell,
was the task to somehow "establish ways and means of eliminating skiers
obviously not yet qualified to engage in competition on a national level." In
May, 1956, The Water Skier published the first qualifications for National
tournament competitors. Prior to this, the tournament was open to any
skier holding membership in AWSA.
To qualify for the 1956 tournament a skier must have placed
first, second or third in a sanctioned Regional tournament during the previous
three
years, or must have qualified by reason of holding an Expert rating
in the Men's
division,
or at least a First Class rating for all other divisions. One hundred
sixty-three skiers, the greatest number yet, qualified and skied at
the LaPorte, Ind.,
tournament that year!
In 1960, eligibility for the Nationals depended upon placement in prior
National or Regional tournaments plus having an Expert rating in
all events which
the skier entered, or by having a Master rating in an event regardless
of prior
tournament placement.
And so the battle for containing the Nationals went into the '60's,
'70's and continues to this day. Editorials appeared in The Water
Skier, debates
were
held by the Board of Directors, committee reports presented, individual
opinions expressed, rules changed - but with it all, the Nationals
continued to expand
- going from three to four and finally to five days.
Fueling the growth over the years has been a continuous increase
in the number of participants in water skiing, a certain percentage
of
whom
are encouraged
to become competitive skiers. It appears to be an unending process.
As National tournament eligibility requirements are
raised, up go the proficiency levels of the skiers who are trying
to get into the tournament. The Nationals entry list has been considerably
more
than 400
for each of the past three years.
Few neophyte organizations can successfully define their philosophical
concepts, and AWSA was no exception. If anyone had asked Dan Hains
in 1939 to explain
the future role of the National Championships, he probably would
have been hard pressed to do so.
The
development of the Nationals to its present position as the premier AWSA sanctioned
tournament has been an evolutionary process
that
continues today.
Its true role, and the guiding principles behind the tournament's
operation, were clearly defined in 1974 by a blue ribbon committee
studying the
question of limiting the number of participants. Among other recommendations,
including
expanding the number of days to five, the committee urged AWSA
to affirm its position that the National tournament belonged to
and
was an integral
part
of the association. The committee went on to state, "The Nationals,
in the eyes of the majority of our members, is to be an attainable
goal for those
willing to devote a considerable portion of their lives to water
skiing, and not a show for the benefit of super-skiers and spectators.
The goal of the
board, and the committees working under it, should be to keep the
Nationals to manageable proportions so that those who set this
tournament as their goal
may find it an enjoyable experience when they get there."
As long as the National tournament remains an enjoyable experience
for those who participate, it will continue to serve as a mirror
reflecting the goals
and the hopes of AWSA and its members.

How Not to Take Up Slack
Ingenuity has its place in water skiing, and the problem
of slack line in the early days of jumping (before the advent of the double-cut)
led to the
development of a questionable gadget called a "bazooka." Bill Clifford,
writing about it in the January, 1967 issue of The Water Skier. likened the
device to an eight-foot long cannon mounted at the stern of the towboat. Inside
a four-inch diameter pipe were several elastic shock cords which could be stretched
by an operator in the boat. If everything worked as it should, when a jumper
had cleared the ramp the pre-stretched shock cord was released and - being
attached to the skier's towline - would immediately take up the slack, pulling
the skier along too.
How well it worked can be judged from Clifford's amusing account of his experience
with the device at the 1951 Dixie Tournament:
" What followed. . . was the greatest assortment of flips, flops, nose dives
and somersaults that the sport had ever seen. . . Profiting from what I had
seen, I was careful not to swing out hard - as the boat made its turn - to
insure that I was stretching the shock cord to a minimum. I assumed a deep
crouch and grasped the handle as tightly as possible as I headed for the
jump. Once on the jump, I was snatched headlong, sans skis, into a tumbling arc
that
included all of the contortions of people who fall from high places. The
resultant splat was stunning. a distance of some 70 feet, which was a good fall
in those
days and farther than many jumps."
|